CHAMBASan Joaquin Valley Manufacturers AllianceSJVMA

Snapshot
Skills map
Employers
Programs

Loading programs

Data vintage. Employer figures come from CHAMBA Skills assessments completed by San Joaquin Valley Manufacturers Alliance members. Pay figures come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 release.

Methodology. A place is shown only when at least 3 employers there have completed an assessment and no single employer accounts for more than 80 percent of what it reports. Suppressed places are drawn exactly like places with no data, so nothing can be inferred from the difference. No individual company’s pay is ever shown.

Published by CHAMBA Skills with San Joaquin Valley Manufacturers Alliance (opens in a new tab).

Construction Technology — Fresno Unified | SJVMA + CHAMBA Skills

All training programs

Fresno Unified

Construction Technology

DeWolf High School

Sweep: Source confirmedProvider: unclaimed

Swept July 2026, verify before enrolling. See what the sweep found (opens in a new tab)

Skills taught

Construction tools
safety
building systems
project-based work

Program record

Institution: Fresno Unified
Provider type: High school CTE
Credential: High-school CTE pathway / multi-course sequence; industry credentials, dual enrollment and work-based learning vary by site
Discipline: Construction trades · adjacent to manufacturing
County: Fresno County · Fresno
Audience: Grades 9-12 / youth workforce pipeline
Partners and funding: Fresno Unified
What the sweep found: Public district/ROP source lists Construction Technology at DeWolf High School.
Source: https://www.fresnounified.org/departments/ccr/cte/brochure (opens in a new tab)

Employer ratings

Not enough ratings yet. An average appears once 3 employers have rated this program, so no single company's opinion can be read off the page.

Ratings come from employers who have completed a CHAMBA Skills assessment. Individual ratings and any written feedback stay private to CHAMBA and this program’s reviewers.

Is this record wrong?

This came from a public page, not from the provider. Anyone can propose a correction and an administrator reviews it before the directory changes.

Request a revision Ask us to remove it